Site search

Recent Comments:

  • PSN News: Hi there, of course this piece of writing is actually good and I have learned lot of things from it on the topic of blogging. thanks.
  • Matthew: Unfortunately for you my site is all done with Wordpress now.
  • Graham Handley: Hi Matthew, just stumbled across your site whilst trying to work out how to add a pdf to download on my site (created in iweb), is your site still created using...
  • Matthew: I can’t really help you off forum, that isn’t really fair to me. I certainly wouldn’t use Java to develop Cococa applications these days, its...
  • Chan: Hi Matthew, I was following one of your thread at http://forums.macrumors .com/showthread.php?t=1 93143 I was wondering if you could help me out “HOW DO I PASS...

Tags

 

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Aug »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Categories

Archives

Misc

A retraction

I feel I owe a retraction from my previous piece: http://matthewhutton.com/2009/03/uk-democracy-still-functions/

The MP’s last week published their expenses in full after blacking out almost all of the detail – unfortunately they didn’t quite black out enough:
Railway ticket for my MP

Now aside from blacking out the class of travel, the number of people travelling, the ticket type and the destination and start points – none of which are actually national security issues (which is the only reason not to publish them) – ultimately if you are doing something you don’t want to reveal you have to use your £60k salary to fund it.

Unfortunately he hasn’t quite blocked out all the useful information on the ticket. The ticket says Y-P on it, which means that it was bought with a young persons railcard. Now my MP is quite young, but he’s been in power since 1997 so he can’t possibly be under 25.

So either he was travelling illegally under a young persons railcard – or he is claiming other peoples rail journeys under expenses and hiding it.

I suppose he could be claiming for some of his staff, and they could be under 25, but that is stretching the excuses.

Write a comment